SetSize110140 HaggartyD
Daniel Haggarty

Has anyone seen MAIAT?


The short answer to that is -  I hope not. That’s because something bad might have happened that has triggered the attendance of a Multi-Agency Initial Assessment Team (MAIAT). But what is MAIAT and what does it do?

In preparation for the Olympics (including the Olympic Torch Relay), a MAIAT team was established in West Midlands. The City of Coventry Stadium (known as the Ricoh Arena to Coventry City FC fans) was one of the designated Olympic venues and Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service and West Midlands Fire Service had been asked to provide specialist support to Dorset, which was hosting the sailing events at Weymouth and Portland.

West Midlands Fire Service (WMFS) uniquely employs four Scientific Advisors, who are able to provide scientific support as a result of, and in addition to, their external main jobs. This was a concept devised by Rob Mitchell, who also acts as the Principal Scientific Advisor to the team. I was selected to be one of the four Scientific Advisors, thanks to my experience gained with NCEC.

Left to right: Andy Grosvenor, Neil Millward, Tony Ward (all WMFS) and Bill Atkinson

The principle of MAIAT is thus, “The MAIAT will provide an initial assessment of actual or potential Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN) events and rapidly detect, identify and monitor the presence of any hazardous substance to secure an informed and proportionate multi-agency response”. It builds on the concept of inter-agency working and preparedness for CBRN events, laid down in the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. The ‘Team’ part of MAIAT usually drawn from the three main emergency services and the idea is for the team to make the initial assessment in a low-key way, only alerting the public if it judged that there is a genuine risk.

The MAIAT used for the Olympic Torch Relay (OTR) and the football, comprised three vehicles each containing one representative each from police, fire and ambulance. As a Scientific Advisor I was one of the three fire personnel. Rather than having the full Detection Identification and Monitoring (DIM) equipment available, a much smaller (but still very capable) ‘toolkit’ was available to us to carry out some basic monitoring if needed. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was also scaled back – after all you can’t do an initial assessment in a gas-tight suit!

In the event of a suspected incident, the idea was for all three personnel in one car to respond, with the other vehicles either offering backup if needed or able to attend other incidents. During the OTR, the vehicles were stationed (sometimes quite literally – I enjoyed touring fire stations) a few minutes away from the route, out of main side but able to respond quickly if needed. Thankfully, the OTR went off without any incident and the same was true of the football in Coventry, although to answer a question I anticipate you’re thinking, no we weren’t able to pay much attention to the events on the pitch.

The second MAIAT team I was part of in Dorset was set up in a slightly different way. Once again all of the services were present, but were not mixed. All were stationed near to the Olympic venue but the services stayed together. There were reports in one newspaper about the police living in a ‘holiday camp’. All I can say is if that was true, I was with the wrong emergency service! The accommodation was a converted mobile office at the rear of Weymouth Community Centre (which includes the fire station). I think the hotel inspector had not yet had a chance to visit to award it a star rating, but I’m not sure how many stars you would get for 14 people sharing two rooms dormitory style. Still, it had atmosphere (especially after those who were off-duty had returned from a night out in the town!). It’s certainly true that you get to know your colleagues a lot better in these circumstances!


It was no holiday camp, but it sufficed. Until the really bad snorers turned up!

The time down there did allow us some rare dedicated training opportunities together with refreshers on the DIM equipment and the chance to demonstrate the equipment to the local fire crews and the other emergency services who visited the fire station. Several other fire functions including Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) and a fire boat crew, from Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service, were also staying with us. At this point I should give a big shout out to Simon Carey and Nigel Toose, both coxswains and thoroughly decent blokes, who had to put up not only with my occasional snoring (although I wasn’t the worst offender by a long chalk!) but also allowed me on-board their fire boat for as many hours as I could manage. Being out on the fire boat meant that I got to enter the Olympic Sailing Village and see the huge flotilla of boats involved in the racing. As well as the competitors there are the timekeepers, the marshals, the media boats, the team boats, police boats, coastguard and even the occasional spectator boat out on the water. Being able to see all of this gave me more of a sense of the Olympic occasion.

I didn’t get to meet Ben Ainsley, sadly, although I came very close when he passed by while I was browsing in the souvenirs shop. I got an expensive badge from the shop, but he got a gold medal of course.

Left to right: Simon Carey (Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue), Bill Atkinson and Nigel Toose (DSFRS).

Every day we would attend a briefing and then plan our activities– training, exercising (literally and technically) or hosting visits. As well as the trips on the fire boat, I also got a chance to play a live casualty in a training exercise for the HART (Hazardous Area Response Team) ambulance team. At one point they had to evacuate the casualties, or at least some of them. I was one of the ones left behind. As one of the HART team wryly observed later on, “it’s always the larger ones that get left behind in training”.

Apart from training, the whole event went by relatively incident free. My advice was called upon once, although it was quite early in the morning. I was asked whether soap could be used to make explosives. Even after a sudden awakening, I was able to confirm that that was not very likely. A fire colleague volunteered that he agreed with my advice unless it was ‘to make a clean bomb’. I thought that quite witty, especially considering it was still before 6am.

Since the successful conclusion to the Olympics, there has been much talk of ‘legacy’. For me, I hope the main legacy is that the close cooperation and camaraderie established between the personnel involved in the MAIATs is maintained and can be applied to future events (and one in which we would be happy to participate at NCEC). For me, that would be like our ‘gold medal’ moment. No special postage stamp or painted postbox required.


Past Blogs

RaineCaroline BW2
Caroline Raine, Principle Consultant

Final Annex VIII to CLP published

RaineCaroline BW2
Caroline Raine, Principle Consultant

Final Annex VIII to CLP imminent

WalkerStephen BW2
Stephen Walker, Senior Consultant

ADR 2017 - key changes

Pierre Noël, Safety Manager and Chief Elf at North Pole

A Compliance Christmas Carol

Larissa Silver, Emergency Responder Supervisor and Chemical Regulatory Consulant

Tool for poison centres launched by EU Commission

Caroline Raine, Principle Consultant

Lithium batteries - changes to IATA regulations

RaineCaroline BW
Caroline Raine, Principle Consultant

Update to poison centre regulations

LangJonathan BW
Jon Lang, Emergency Responder and Chemical Regulatory Consultant

Keeping your SDS updated and compliant

Dan Haggarty, Head of Emergency Response

What does best practice mean to industry?

LangJonathan BW
Jon Lang, Emergency Responder and Chemical Regulatory Consultant

SDS Section 1.4 – what numbers are needed?

WalkerStephen BW
Stephen Walker, Senior Consultant DGSA

Health and Safety Executive (HSE) prosecution

paddedimage110161 SilverLarissa BW
Larissa Silver, Emergency Responder

European Commission’s new draft amendments review

Maria Stearn, Chemdata Manager

The value of proportionate advice

Pierre Noel, Safety Manager and Chief Elf at North Pole Inc.

NCEC Christmas Guest Blog

paddedimage110161 SilverLarissa BW
Larissa Silver, Emergency Responder

Selling chemical products into France or Spain?

Rich Davey, International Business Development Manager

Overcoming regulatory barriers: challenges in Asia

Tuan Vu, Chemical Emergency Responder

The Tianjin Explosion

Jonathan Gibbard, NCEC Practice Director

10 days, 3 countries - NCEC tours South East Asia

Tom Baker, Senior Emergency Responder

Update for Spanish poison centre

Tom Baker, Senior Emergency Responder

The importance of emergency telephone response

SetSize110140 Matthew Hawes National Chemical Emergency Centre
Matthew Hawes

On-scene emergency response

Matthew Hawes National Chemical Emergency Centre
Matthew Hawes - Emergency Response Specialist

Don’t cry over spilled milk.....

Matthew Hawes National Chemical Emergency Centre
Matthew Hawes - Emergency Response Specialist

Too small to matter.....

SetSize110140 GibbardJ
Jon Gibbard

Problems with poison centres

Daniel Haggarty

Feature chemical – hydrogen sulfide

Jonathan Gibbard

NCEC - Celebrating Its Heritage...

SetSize110140 HaggartyD
Daniel Haggarty

NCEC in action

Matthew Hawes

The effect of fertilisers...

Daniel Haggarty

Fee For Intervention (FFI)

Matthew Hawes

Multilateral Agreements and free trade

Matthew Hawes

GHS and emergency response

Daniel Haggarty

Lithium battery regulations

Daniel Haggarty

Typical emergency calls

Daniel Haggarty

Chemical incidents…then and now

SetSize110140 HaggartyD
Daniel Haggarty

Has anyone seen MAIAT?

Daniel Haggarty

Emergency Responder Candidates

Daniel Haggarty

Implications of OCRS


Post your comment

Comments for this page have been disabled


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments